The academic called out other researchers and commentators for their small-mindedness.
Earlier
this month, Avi Loeb, the head of Harvard University's astronomy
department, drew widespread criticism and mockery for his paper
suggesting the mysterious interstellar object called ‘Oumuamua could be
an alien spacecraft. But Loeb isn't backing down, he's doubling down.
"I regard being a scientist as a great privilege of maintaining your
childhood curiosity, because children ask questions. They are not afraid
of being wrong," Loeb told Ars Technica's Rob Reid. "Somehow, when they
become adults, adults lose that inner sense. That includes scientists
as well. Many of my colleagues are not willing to take risks. Not daring
to be wrong, and that's a problem, because sometimes we just don't know
in advance what's right and what's wrong. We have to take the risk
in order to make discoveries, because what I want to understand is what
‘Oumuamua is. For that purpose, it doesn't really matter how popular is
one idea versus the other on Twitter. It is what it is, and we want
to find out."
Loeb said he doesn't think humans have progressed much since Galileo's time, when scientists were persecuted for speaking out against established facts about the universe.
"The academic community has this concept of tenure, where someone has faculty position for life, [irrespective] of what happens, OK? As long as that person doesn't commit a crime. That is a great privilege. It's a privilege to follow ideas to where they lead you without worrying about what other people think. However, many practitioners in academia do not use that privilege. Once they get to the position of tenure, they worry about their image and about not being wrong. By doing so, they betray the purpose of their profession. The tenure process is aimed at allowing you the freedom of coming up with your own conclusions, and therefore, if people have a problem with this idea, they should come up with a specific alternative interpretation of the extra push that ‘Oumuamua has, rather than calling names or saying things without scientific context."
Loeb said he thought the public would be both interested by, and benefit from, an honest debate about subjects of dispute among scientists. He faulted his fellow scientists for eschewing topics the public is interested in by associating them with simplicity and plebeian attitudes not worth their time to investigate.
"I think the same approach should be adapted in the context of looking at all the interstellar objects that arrive at our door and examining each and every one of them. Even if ‘Oumuamua is natural in origin."
Loeb recently sat down for a lengthy interview with science publication Ars Technica, which the website published
on Thursday, in which he defended the science behind his conclusions.
Loeb turned the issue around, though, going on the offensive
by suggesting that his critics were abdicating their responsibility
as academics and scientists rather than taking risks and remaining
humble.
Avi Loeb, Chair of Harvard Astronomy, speaking at the Falling Walls Foundation, November 26, 2018
Loeb said he doesn't think humans have progressed much since Galileo's time, when scientists were persecuted for speaking out against established facts about the universe.
CC BY 4.0 / ESO/M. Kornmesser / The first interstellar asteroid, `Oumuamua
"Many people think they know the answer
in advance," he said. "People still have a lot of prejudice about what
the outcome of science should be, and they want to see that answer."
"One should remain humble," he emphasized."The academic community has this concept of tenure, where someone has faculty position for life, [irrespective] of what happens, OK? As long as that person doesn't commit a crime. That is a great privilege. It's a privilege to follow ideas to where they lead you without worrying about what other people think. However, many practitioners in academia do not use that privilege. Once they get to the position of tenure, they worry about their image and about not being wrong. By doing so, they betray the purpose of their profession. The tenure process is aimed at allowing you the freedom of coming up with your own conclusions, and therefore, if people have a problem with this idea, they should come up with a specific alternative interpretation of the extra push that ‘Oumuamua has, rather than calling names or saying things without scientific context."
Loeb said he thought the public would be both interested by, and benefit from, an honest debate about subjects of dispute among scientists. He faulted his fellow scientists for eschewing topics the public is interested in by associating them with simplicity and plebeian attitudes not worth their time to investigate.
CC BY 4.0 / ESO/M. Kornmesser / The first interstellar asteroid, `Oumuamua
"I say, ‘Who cares about what people say?
Nature is what nature is.' I try to understand it, and if it happens
to be alien civilizations, and people are very excited about it, that's
great. If it happens to be the nature of dark matter, and people don't
care about it…. I want to understand nature, and I think nature is
always beautiful; the only thing that can be ugly is human made," Loeb
said.
"One of the reasons to explore space is because you can see nature
left on its own. But if you go to the beach, and I like to do that
on vacation with my daughters, and you look at seashells that were swept
ashore, you see all kinds of seashells that came from different
origins; and every now and then, you see a plastic bottle, which came
from an artificial origin.""I think the same approach should be adapted in the context of looking at all the interstellar objects that arrive at our door and examining each and every one of them. Even if ‘Oumuamua is natural in origin."
"First, we learn about the completely different
process that makes these weird class of objects with much larger
abundance than we ever expected. But in the more interesting case, we
might learn about another civilization, and without a prejudice, we are
just collecting data about the universe," Loeb said.
Recall that a spacecraft leaving your solar system experienced the same effect though at a greater distance?
ReplyDeletehttps://cassiopaea.org/forum/threads/session-1-december-2018.46564/